Tax dispute resolution

SARS Objections & Tax Appeals

Expert legal representation for objections, appeals, alternative dispute resolution, the Tax Board and Tax Court—built around strategy, evidence and decisive action.

R1bn+

Saved for taxpayers

Impeccable

Success rate on accepted disputes

R1m+

Typical dispute value

Objection · Appeal · ADR · Tax Court

“Your masterful strategy in slowly and tactically building the case was central to SARS abandoning the fight.”

R. Hughes
Corporate client

Our approach

100% results driven

Strategic. Practical. Thorough.

✓ Legal-oriented tax strategy
✓ Lawyers, CAs and former SARS expertise
✓ Strict confidentiality
✓ Clear fees before engagement
When SARS won’t budge, we do.

TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION

A tax dispute needs more than a response. It needs the right strategy, at the right time, backed by specialists who know how to move the matter forward.

Start Here

Objection or appeal-what happens next?

A tax dispute progresses through defined stages. The quality of the legal grounds, supporting evidence and strategy at each stage can determine the eventual outcome.

01

Objection

Challenge a SARS assessment or decision with properly framed legal grounds, supporting documents and a clear evidentiary case. Time limits are critical, and late objections require a condonation strategy. Objections are legal documents that require expert knowledge.

02

Representation with content

We manage the dispute strategy, correspondence, pleadings, evidence and representation through to resolution.

03

Other Remedies

Some tax disputes are not handled through the normal objection and appeal process. Our founder wrote the book on all the ways to challenge SARS. We know our way around tax problems even if objection and/or appeal doors are closed.

04

Tax Appeal

Where an objection is disallowed or only partly allowed, the matter may proceed through ADR, the Tax Board or the Tax Court. The procedural complexity of a tax dispute increases significantly when an objection is disallowed, and a Tax Appeal is required.

Cases We Typically Handle

Complex, high-value and time-sensitive

Factually or legally complicated

Everything has been tried, the case is not progressing, or the matter appears impossible to resolve.

High-value disputes

Tax in dispute or understatement penalties typically exceed R1 million.

Late or prescribed matters

Deadlines have been missed, an assessment may have prescribed, or SARS is not responding.

Invalid or disallowed objections

An objection has been declared invalid, disallowed or only partially allowed.

Audits

The disputed assessment follows an audit or verification by SARS.

ADR and litigation

You need strategic representation at ADR, the Tax Board, Tax Court or in related proceedings.

Case examples

Tax disputes we regularly see.

Select a case type to view the full description.

01

Case example

Bank statement cases.

These are assessments where SARS alleges the taxpayer did not declare income in a bank statement to SARS. They are notoriously difficult to defend and, if done properly, very time consuming. Taxpayers are often frustrated by the fact that the liability is obviously overstated but underestimates the burden of proving the assessment wrong.

02

Case example

Crypto taxes.

These are cases where SARS over taxes crypto gains. The dispute often turns of the classification of gains on revenue or capital account. What makes them particularly difficult is the scattered nature of transaction records.

03

Case example

Lifestyle audits.

These are cases where SARS requested of the taxpayer to complete balance sheet and income statement forms and then assumes certain undeclared income based on changes in asset value and income and expenses.

04

Case example

Understatement penalties.

These are penalties imposed for “substantial understatement” (10%), “reasonable care not taken in completing a return (25%)”, “no reasonable grounds for tax position taken” (50%), “gross negligence” (100% – a SARS favorite) and “intentional tax evasion” (150%).

05

Case example

Prescribed assessments.

These are cases where SARS opens up very old tax years and raises new tax liabilities despite the fact that the assessments may have already prescribed.

06

Case example

Offshore income.

These are cases where SARS has identified income earned outside South Africa like for example, foreign rental income, foreign employment income, foreign free lance work, foreign cryptos or offshore investment income.

07

Case example

Expat taxes.

These are cases where SARS has identified income earned for employment services rendered outside South Africa but is refusing to allow the exemption.

08

Case example

Financial Instruments.

These are cases involving the tax treatment of complex financial instruments such as CFD’s, bond/securities lending arrangements, short selling, option contracts, government bonds etc.

09

Case example

Loan account being taxed.

These are cases where someone has funded an enterprise/business or transaction with a loan and SARS considers repayments of those loans as taxable income. Or, for example, where a company originally funded a shareholder’s expenses via loan/s.

10

Case example

Online Gambling taxes.

These are cases where SARS considers the taxpayer to be a professional gambler or as conducting a gambling trade. SARS typically also then does not allow gambling expenses relating in inflated tax bills.

11

Case example

Alleged fraud.

These are cases where the taxpayer has been the victim of fraud committed by a “advisor” (sometimes even claiming to be from SARS). These fraudsters often create fictitious documents or refunds to clear tax debts and the taxpayer is left facing SARS when it is discovered.

12

Case example

Advisor errors.

These are cases where taxpayers have relied on advisors but have been let down resulting in SARS raising assessments.

13

Case example

Trusts and beneficiary vesting cases.

These are cases where SARS deems the vesting event not to have occurred and the trust ending up with an additional assessment. This is often despite the fact that the beneficiary may have declared the tax resulting in double tax.

14

Case example

Valuation disputes.

These are cases where the value of a transaction is being questioned by SARS resulting in overstated tax liabilities.

15

Case example

Burden of proof cases.

These are cases where SARS appears to simply refuse or ignore evidence submitted and maintains that the taxpayer has not discharged their burden of proof.

16

Case example

Legal interpretation cases.

These are cases where the main issue in dispute is the correct interpretation of a tax provision.

17

Case example

Reversed refunds.

These are cases where SARS has disallowed PAYE credits, VAT input tax or made other deductions with the effect of wiping out or reversing a tax refund/expected refund.

18

Case example

SARS refuses to pay out refunds.

These are cases where SARS refuses to pay out refunds, often despite being obligated to do so.

19

Case example

SARS declines suspension of payment requests.

These are cases where SARS declines or revokes a suspension of payment application and threatens to/takes collection action

20

Case example

SARS issued a notice of audit findings.

These are cases where SARS is proposing to raise an assessment that is incorrect and gives the taxpayer a chance to respond within 21 days otherwise they raise the assessment.

Our Process

A strategic path from assessment to resolution


01

Case Review

We assess the assessment, audit history, deadlines, evidence and previous submissions.

02

Strategy

We identify the strongest legal and factual grounds and choose the most effective remedy.

03

Execution

We prepare the objection, appeal, ADR submissions or litigation documents and engage SARS.

04

Resolution

We pursue the best available outcome through withdrawal, settlement, ADR or adjudication.

Why Unicus Tax

We know the law, the procedure and how SARS works

Team Leadership

Led by Nico Theron

Founder of Unicus Tax Specialists and author of Practical Guide to Handling Tax Disputes, published by LexisNexis. Nico is recognised for a strategic and pragmatic approach to resolving tax disputes. Nico also lectures on Tax dispute resolution at Masters and Honours level at the University of Pretoria

BCom Law (Cum Laude)
LLM Tax Law
BCom Hons Taxation
MCom Taxation

From the moment we accept an engagement, we think strategy: where is the case strong, where is it weak (importantly also – where is SARS weak), and what is the fastest, most effective route to resolution?

Successful dispute resolution requires command of substantive tax law, procedural tax law rules, SARS systems and the evidentiary burden. Our multidisciplinary team combines tax lawyers, chartered accountants, business and former SARS audit experience.

Why Unicus Tax

We know the law, the procedure and how SARS works

Successful dispute resolution requires command of substantive tax law, procedural tax law rules, SARS systems and the evidentiary burden. Our multidisciplinary team combines tax lawyers, chartered accountants, business and former SARS audit experience.

Team Leadership

Led by Nico Theron

Founder of Unicus Tax Specialists and author of Practical Guide to Handling Tax Disputes, published by LexisNexis. Nico is recognised for a strategic and pragmatic approach to resolving tax disputes. Nico also lectures on Tax dispute resolution at Masters and Honours level at the University of Pretoria.

BCom Law (Cum Laude)LLM Tax LawBCom Hons TaxationMCom Taxation

From the moment we accept an engagement, we think strategy: where is the case strong, where is it weak (importantly also – where is SARS weak), and what is the fastest, most effective route to resolution?

Frequently Asked Questions

Important things to know

SARS objections and appeals form part of the tax dispute resolution process and allow taxpayers to challenge an assessment or decision made by SARS. An objection is generally the first formal step in disputing a SARS assessment or decision.

A taxpayer generally has 80 business days from the date of the assessment or decision to submit an objection, subject to the applicable tax dispute rules and any provisions dealing with late objections. The objection must be submitted in the prescribed manner and should clearly set out the grounds of objection together with the relevant supporting documentation.

SARS will generally notify the taxpayer whether the objection has been allowed, partially allowed or disallowed within the applicable prescribed period, which is ordinarily 60 business days, subject to circumstances in which SARS may be entitled to a longer period. SARS may also request additional supporting documents before deciding the objection.

If an objection is disallowed or only partially allowed, the taxpayer may generally submit an appeal within 30 business days of the notice of the objection decision. The appeal must set out the grounds on which the taxpayer disagrees with SARS and include the required supporting information.

Depending on the circumstances, the dispute may proceed through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or ultimately to litigation before the Tax Board or Tax Court. ADR provides an opportunity for SARS and the taxpayer to attempt to resolve the dispute without proceeding directly to a hearing.

Yes. Certain tax disputes may be dealt with through SARS’s alternative dispute resolution process, which is similar in some respects to mediation. ADR can provide a more efficient and less costly means of resolving a dispute than formal litigation.

Taxpayers may be entitled to object to and appeal various assessments and decisions relating to matters such as income tax, VAT, transfer duty and other taxes administered by SARS, depending on whether the particular assessment or decision is objectionable and appealable under the relevant tax legislation.

Yes. In appropriate circumstances, a taxpayer may request reasons for an assessment or decision. Obtaining reasons can help the taxpayer understand the basis of SARS’s position and formulate the grounds of objection.

Depending on the circumstances and the applicable legislation, a taxpayer may be able to request the remission of certain penalties or interest. The requirements and procedure will depend on the particular penalty, interest charge or SARS decision involved.

No. The fact that an assessment is disputed does not generally suspend the obligation to pay the tax. A taxpayer may, however, apply to SARS for a suspension of payment while an objection or appeal is being considered.

The objection and appeal procedures provide taxpayers with a formal mechanism to challenge assessments or decisions they believe are incorrect or unjustified. They also give SARS an opportunity to reconsider its position, review the evidence and correct errors where appropriate.

An objection should clearly identify the assessment or decision being disputed, explain the specific detailed legal grounds on which the taxpayer disagrees with SARS, and include relevant supporting documents and evidence. Clear, properly formulated grounds of objection are important because they define the issues in dispute.

The taxpayer must first submit an objection, generally within 80 business days of the assessment or decision. SARS considers the objection and issues its decision. If the objection is disallowed or partially allowed, the taxpayer may generally appeal within 30 business days. The dispute may then proceed through ADR, the Tax Board or the Tax Court, depending on the circumstances.

Confidential Case Review

Get expert help with your SARS dispute

Your enquiry will be reviewed to assess whether we can assist. We will confirm the proposed scope, process and fees before any work begins. If you are an accountant, auditor, lawyer, advocate or other tax professional seeking assistance for your client, please visit the practitioner help desk.

Cases We Typically Handle

Complex, high-value and time-sensitive

Factually or legally complicated

Everything has been tried, the case is not progressing, or the matter appears impossible to resolve.

High-value disputes

Tax in dispute or understatement penalties typically exceed R1 million.

Late or prescribed matters

Deadlines have been missed, an assessment may have prescribed, or SARS is not responding.

Invalid or disallowed objections

An objection has been declared invalid, disallowed or only partially allowed.

Audits

The disputed assessment follows an audit or verification by SARS.

ADR and litigation

You need strategic representation at ADR, the Tax Board, Tax Court or in related proceedings.

Our Process

A strategic path from assessment to resolution

01

Case Review

We assess the assessment, audit history, deadlines, evidence and previous submissions.

02

Strategy

We identify the strongest legal and factual grounds and choose the most effective remedy.

03

Execution

We prepare the objection, appeal, ADR submissions or litigation documents and engage SARS.

04

Resolution

We pursue the best available outcome through withdrawal, settlement, ADR or adjudication.