SARS Objections & Tax Appeals
Expert legal representation for objections, appeals, alternative dispute resolution, the Tax Board and Tax Court—built around strategy, evidence and decisive action.
R1bn+
Saved for taxpayers
Impeccable
Success rate on accepted disputes
R1m+
Typical dispute value
“Your masterful strategy in slowly and tactically building the case was central to SARS abandoning the fight.”
R. Hughes
Corporate client
100% results driven
Strategic. Practical. Thorough.
When SARS won’t budge, we do.
TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A tax dispute needs more than a response. It needs the right strategy, at the right time, backed by specialists who know how to move the matter forward.
Objection or appeal-what happens next?
A tax dispute progresses through defined stages. The quality of the legal grounds, supporting evidence and strategy at each stage can determine the eventual outcome.
Objection
Challenge a SARS assessment or decision with properly framed legal grounds, supporting documents and a clear evidentiary case. Time limits are critical, and late objections require a condonation strategy. Objections are legal documents that require expert knowledge.
Representation with content
We manage the dispute strategy, correspondence, pleadings, evidence and representation through to resolution.
Other Remedies
Some tax disputes are not handled through the normal objection and appeal process. Our founder wrote the book on all the ways to challenge SARS. We know our way around tax problems even if objection and/or appeal doors are closed.
Tax Appeal
Where an objection is disallowed or only partly allowed, the matter may proceed through ADR, the Tax Board or the Tax Court. The procedural complexity of a tax dispute increases significantly when an objection is disallowed, and a Tax Appeal is required.
Complex, high-value and time-sensitive
Factually or legally complicated
Everything has been tried, the case is not progressing, or the matter appears impossible to resolve.
High-value disputes
Tax in dispute or understatement penalties typically exceed R1 million.
Late or prescribed matters
Deadlines have been missed, an assessment may have prescribed, or SARS is not responding.
Invalid or disallowed objections
An objection has been declared invalid, disallowed or only partially allowed.
Audits
The disputed assessment follows an audit or verification by SARS.
ADR and litigation
You need strategic representation at ADR, the Tax Board, Tax Court or in related proceedings.
Tax disputes we regularly see.
Select a case type to view the full description.
01
Case example
Bank statement cases.
These are assessments where SARS alleges the taxpayer did not declare income in a bank statement to SARS. They are notoriously difficult to defend and, if done properly, very time consuming. Taxpayers are often frustrated by the fact that the liability is obviously overstated but underestimates the burden of proving the assessment wrong.
02
Case example
Crypto taxes.
These are cases where SARS over taxes crypto gains. The dispute often turns of the classification of gains on revenue or capital account. What makes them particularly difficult is the scattered nature of transaction records.
03
Case example
Lifestyle audits.
These are cases where SARS requested of the taxpayer to complete balance sheet and income statement forms and then assumes certain undeclared income based on changes in asset value and income and expenses.
04
Case example
Understatement penalties.
These are penalties imposed for “substantial understatement” (10%), “reasonable care not taken in completing a return (25%)”, “no reasonable grounds for tax position taken” (50%), “gross negligence” (100% – a SARS favorite) and “intentional tax evasion” (150%).
05
Case example
Prescribed assessments.
These are cases where SARS opens up very old tax years and raises new tax liabilities despite the fact that the assessments may have already prescribed.
06
Case example
Offshore income.
These are cases where SARS has identified income earned outside South Africa like for example, foreign rental income, foreign employment income, foreign free lance work, foreign cryptos or offshore investment income.
07
Case example
Expat taxes.
These are cases where SARS has identified income earned for employment services rendered outside South Africa but is refusing to allow the exemption.
08
Case example
Financial Instruments.
These are cases involving the tax treatment of complex financial instruments such as CFD’s, bond/securities lending arrangements, short selling, option contracts, government bonds etc.
09
Case example
Loan account being taxed.
These are cases where someone has funded an enterprise/business or transaction with a loan and SARS considers repayments of those loans as taxable income. Or, for example, where a company originally funded a shareholder’s expenses via loan/s.
10
Case example
Online Gambling taxes.
These are cases where SARS considers the taxpayer to be a professional gambler or as conducting a gambling trade. SARS typically also then does not allow gambling expenses relating in inflated tax bills.
11
Case example
Alleged fraud.
These are cases where the taxpayer has been the victim of fraud committed by a “advisor” (sometimes even claiming to be from SARS). These fraudsters often create fictitious documents or refunds to clear tax debts and the taxpayer is left facing SARS when it is discovered.
12
Case example
Advisor errors.
These are cases where taxpayers have relied on advisors but have been let down resulting in SARS raising assessments.
13
Case example
Trusts and beneficiary vesting cases.
These are cases where SARS deems the vesting event not to have occurred and the trust ending up with an additional assessment. This is often despite the fact that the beneficiary may have declared the tax resulting in double tax.
14
Case example
Valuation disputes.
These are cases where the value of a transaction is being questioned by SARS resulting in overstated tax liabilities.
15
Case example
Burden of proof cases.
These are cases where SARS appears to simply refuse or ignore evidence submitted and maintains that the taxpayer has not discharged their burden of proof.
16
Case example
Legal interpretation cases.
These are cases where the main issue in dispute is the correct interpretation of a tax provision.
17
Case example
Reversed refunds.
These are cases where SARS has disallowed PAYE credits, VAT input tax or made other deductions with the effect of wiping out or reversing a tax refund/expected refund.
18
Case example
SARS refuses to pay out refunds.
These are cases where SARS refuses to pay out refunds, often despite being obligated to do so.
19
Case example
SARS declines suspension of payment requests.
These are cases where SARS declines or revokes a suspension of payment application and threatens to/takes collection action
20
Case example
SARS issued a notice of audit findings.
These are cases where SARS is proposing to raise an assessment that is incorrect and gives the taxpayer a chance to respond within 21 days otherwise they raise the assessment.
A strategic path from assessment to resolution
Case Review
We assess the assessment, audit history, deadlines, evidence and previous submissions.
Strategy
We identify the strongest legal and factual grounds and choose the most effective remedy.
Execution
We prepare the objection, appeal, ADR submissions or litigation documents and engage SARS.
Resolution
We pursue the best available outcome through withdrawal, settlement, ADR or adjudication.
We know the law, the procedure and how SARS works
Team Leadership
Led by Nico Theron
Founder of Unicus Tax Specialists and author of Practical Guide to Handling Tax Disputes, published by LexisNexis. Nico is recognised for a strategic and pragmatic approach to resolving tax disputes. Nico also lectures on Tax dispute resolution at Masters and Honours level at the University of Pretoria
From the moment we accept an engagement, we think strategy: where is the case strong, where is it weak (importantly also – where is SARS weak), and what is the fastest, most effective route to resolution?
Successful dispute resolution requires command of substantive tax law, procedural tax law rules, SARS systems and the evidentiary burden. Our multidisciplinary team combines tax lawyers, chartered accountants, business and former SARS audit experience.
We know the law, the procedure and how SARS works
Successful dispute resolution requires command of substantive tax law, procedural tax law rules, SARS systems and the evidentiary burden. Our multidisciplinary team combines tax lawyers, chartered accountants, business and former SARS audit experience.
Team Leadership
Led by Nico Theron
Founder of Unicus Tax Specialists and author of Practical Guide to Handling Tax Disputes, published by LexisNexis. Nico is recognised for a strategic and pragmatic approach to resolving tax disputes. Nico also lectures on Tax dispute resolution at Masters and Honours level at the University of Pretoria.
BCom Law (Cum Laude)LLM Tax LawBCom Hons TaxationMCom Taxation
From the moment we accept an engagement, we think strategy: where is the case strong, where is it weak (importantly also – where is SARS weak), and what is the fastest, most effective route to resolution?
Important things to know
Confidential Case Review
Get expert help with your SARS dispute
Your enquiry will be reviewed to assess whether we can assist. We will confirm the proposed scope, process and fees before any work begins. If you are an accountant, auditor, lawyer, advocate or other tax professional seeking assistance for your client, please visit the practitioner help desk.
Complex, high-value and time-sensitive
Factually or legally complicated
Everything has been tried, the case is not progressing, or the matter appears impossible to resolve.
High-value disputes
Tax in dispute or understatement penalties typically exceed R1 million.
Late or prescribed matters
Deadlines have been missed, an assessment may have prescribed, or SARS is not responding.
Invalid or disallowed objections
An objection has been declared invalid, disallowed or only partially allowed.
Audits
The disputed assessment follows an audit or verification by SARS.
ADR and litigation
You need strategic representation at ADR, the Tax Board, Tax Court or in related proceedings.
A strategic path from assessment to resolution
Case Review
We assess the assessment, audit history, deadlines, evidence and previous submissions.
Strategy
We identify the strongest legal and factual grounds and choose the most effective remedy.
Execution
We prepare the objection, appeal, ADR submissions or litigation documents and engage SARS.
Resolution
We pursue the best available outcome through withdrawal, settlement, ADR or adjudication.

